Monday, December 17, 2012

Friday December 14, 2012 at the Western Wall (Dramatized)

Friday December 14, 2012 at the Western Wall (Dramatized)

December 17, 2012

Policeman: Open your coat. Is this a shawl you are wearing?

Woman: Are shawls a problem?

Policeman: Shawls are allowed. I am looking for a tallit.

Woman: Why?

Policeman: As of this morning the Rabbi of the Wall is forbidding tallitot at the Kotel.

Woman: But wait, over there is a man carrying a tallit?

Policeman: The decree applies only to women. Open your bag please. I need to search for a tallit.


Dear Rabbi,

Last Friday we saw gender segregation once again rear its ugly head. During a service at the Western Wall four more women were detained. We have seen this many times in the past, but this month the police tried a new tactic. They decided to collect "offensive" religious items from women before they entered the Western Wall complex.

Despite the authorities' best efforts some women were able to have their tallitot smuggled in by male supporters. The Jerusalem police managed to “protect” the Kotel from Rabbi Elyse Frishman, who is the editor of the Reform prayer book Mishkan Tefila, a board member from Women of the Wall, and two 18-year-old students from the UK in Israel on a NETZER program.

We need your help to keep up the pressure on the Israeli government to make the Western Wall a home for Jews from all denominations.  Add your signature to nearly 30,000 others demanding freedom of worship and pluralism at the holiest site for the Jewish people. Get 10 of your friends to sign. It's easy. It's effective.

When simple items of Judaica become contraband it's time to liberate the Kotel.

L’shalom,
Anat Hoffman,
Executive Director, IRAC

Action Alert: Help the petition grow

Please click here to sign our Kotel Petition. After you have signed come back to this email to help us grow the petition even further. You can help us by collecting 10 additional signatures by forwarding this link to your friends, forwarding this email, or click here to use our special Tell a Friend link.

Prayer for the people of Connecticut


Master of the universe, send Your blessing to the people of Connecticut, to the grieving mothers and fathers, and to the traumatized children.
Please, oh Merciful God, have compassion on us!
Spread Your shelter of peace over the people of Connecticut and over all of us,

.Grant them healing and comfort
May they find strength and courage in the days ahead.

May our voices carry prayers of hope
That the people of Connecticut know that they are not alone.
We mourn the fallen, and our hearts are pained by the grief of the survivors.
Give them comfort and strengthen their endeavors to restore their lives. Heal their bodies and redeem their spirits. Grant wisdom and strength to all who provide help. Grant them light, guide their path, and protect them.

We pray for the day when the bloodshed will end and there will be Shalom!
And let us say ‘Amen’.

On the 6th day of Hanuka, celebrating Rosh Hodesh Tevet, four women were arrested at Judaism's holiest site, praying while wearing tallitot.


On the 6th day of Hanuka, celebrating Rosh Hodesh Tevet, four women were arrested at Judaism's holiest site, praying while wearing tallitot.  

The World Union for Progressive Judaism notes with sadness the treatment received at the hands of Israeli Police who arrested Rabbi Elyse Frishman (senior rabbi of Barnert Temple in Franklin Lakes, New Jersey and a member of the WUPJ Rabbinic Circle, see video below), and two 18 year old women from the UK who were in Israel for the World Union sponsored Netzer Gap-Year Program, as well as a board member of Women of the Wall.  These women, and all others assembled there, were simply trying to pray.  

We join with our Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism in calling for a third section to be created in which men and women can pray together, while respecting the rights of those who chose to pray in separate sections. How ironic that as Jews around the world celebrate the victory of spirit over forced assimilation, that Jews who want to pray have their rights denied by an ultra-orthodox hegemony. We call upon the State to heed its own Supreme Court and find a resolution.   Until that happens, Israel still fails to live up to the ideals upon which it was founded, as a haven for Jews everywhere.  

We support the efforts of the Women of the Wall and our hearts, and our support, go out to those who stood up in the face of injustice for the sake of the greater Jewish community. 

Reform Movement Dismayed by Continued Religious Discrimination in Israel

Reform Movement Dismayed by Continued Religious Discrimination in Israel

Contact: Jo Ann Mort
joann.mort@gmail.com
718-954-0352


New York, NY, December 14, 2012 – Friday morning, Israeli police detained four women as they prayed at the Western Wall in Jerusalem. The group of 138 men and women was organized by Women of the Wall, an organization that fights for women's right to pray freely, while donning prayer shawls and other religious articles, at the Western Wall. Among those detained was Reform Rabbi Elyse Frishman, senior rabbi of Barnert Temple in Franklin Lakes, NJ, the oldest synagogue in New Jersey and editor of the Reform Movement's siddur (prayer book), CCAR's Mishkan T'filah, used in over 700 North American congregations.

In response to these detentions, URJ President Rabbi Rick Jacobs said, "The Reform Movement is shocked and disappointed by the continuous discrimination against non-Orthodox worshipers at the Western Wall, the holiest site for Jews. The Kotel should be open to the entire Jewish people and must not be used as a tool of division. We urge the Israeli government to repeal these discriminatory policies and be true to the democratic ideals on which the state was founded. This incident is a visible reminder of what non-Orthodox Jews face every day in Israel. Because of our deep love for Israel we are committed to ensuring that Jews are free to practice Judaism in whichever way they choose."

Rabbi Marla J. Feldman, executive director of Women of Reform Judaism, said, "The Western Wall should be a place that unites the Jewish people, where all responsible, courteous worshipers are welcomed and respected. Women of Reform Judaism will visit the Kotel with Women of the Wall in March as part of our organization's centennial celebration. We hope to be able to pray freely there with our Israeli sisters."

Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR) Chief Executive Rabbi Steve Fox and Chairman of ARZA Rabbi Bennett Miller, affirm their support for Rabbi Frishman, one of the leading rabbis of the Reform Movement, and affirm the Reform rabbinate's historic commitment to religious pluralism in Israel and the continuing need to advance the rights of women throughout the world.

Early this morning, a new decree was issued forbidding women to enter the Kotel with religious articles, including prayer shawls and phylacteries; women bearing these articles were searched and stripped of them at a security checkpoint.

In October, police intervened as women, including Anat Hoffman, executive director of the Israel Religious Action Center and chairwoman of Women of the Wall, prayed at the Western Wall.  Hoffman was arrested and charged with the "offense" of wearing a prayer shawl and disturbing public order.

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Reinventing Hanukkah: Lubavitch Looks for the Inner and Outer Light

Reinventing Hanukkah: Lubavitch Looks for the Inner and Outer Light

By NOAM ZION

Under the missionary Lubavitcher rebbe Menahem Mendel Schneersohn in Brooklyn, CHaBaD (Chohkma, Binah, v’Da’at, an acronym of highest and more abstract spheres of the mystical Godhead) has reinvented Hanukkah in ways dialectically related to the Reform and Zionist Hanukkah.

These and only these Hasidim have chosen this holiday to carry their chief ideological and strategic message for Jewish survival and renaissance in the 20th and 21st centuries. For the Reform movement, Hanukkah symbolizes the light of religious liberty shared by Jews and enlightened Americans in contradistinction to benighted obscurantist religion. Therefore the "wall of separation" between church and state which Thomas Jefferson wished to build must keep the public space clear of religious symbols like the Christmas creche, while proud Jews may demonstrate their belief in that value in their homes and synagogues.

But American Chabad places its menorahs – electric, for the most part – on the White House lawn, at the most conspicuous public intersections and even on highways in Florida. Now Chabad knows that such menorahs do not fulfill the mitzvah of lighting candles in your home on the threshold. But they see this as an extension of the mitzvah of publicizing the miracle.

While many Reform Jews are scandalized by this violation of their American democratic faith and fearful that it invites Bible Belt Christians to reconquer the public space, Lubavitchers see it as an assertion of visceral Jewish pride that disregards the desire for conformism and assimilation typical of modern day Hellenists and their obsequies surrender to the darkness of Greek, that is, Western values: 
The Error of Greek Ways

Some people think that Hanukkah is chiefly about a military victory. However, while the military victory was essential, it was a means to the final purpose of purifying the Temple, spiritual survival. In short, the point is to remove Greek pagan influence and spread light of holiness.

Greek culture has two faces. Outwardly it is brilliant and attractive. Inwardly it is rotten and corrupt. It is the culture of sports, circuses and theater. Nevertheless, even in Eretz Yisrael there were Jews who wanted to assimilate, “to live it up” as Hellenists. Hagei Yisrael for Youth, Lubavitch Center for Education
Like Secular Zionists who reclaim the militancy of Judah the Maccabee, Chabad organizes its youth movement in quasi-military fashion, calling it Tzivos HaShem, the Armies of God, and assigning children ranks, as in the army. It sends forth missionaries in Mitzvah “anks” to reconquer secularized Jews by bringing them the light of Torah wherever they may be in the world, from Mumbai to Machu Picchu to Bangkok. The enemy, however, is not hostile Arabs, and the goal is not political independence, but an internal cultural religious civil war with non-Orthodox rabbis and wholly assimilated and hence extinguished Jewish souls (neshama).
Material for this article and the others in this series is adapted from Noam Zion's book, A Different Light, The Hanukkah Book of Celebration.

Lubavitch outreach uses the shamash, the servant candle of the menorah which lights the eight sacred candles, as its symbol – to light the candle is to ignite the lost soul of a Jew who still possesses the "pintele yid," the Jewish spark: 
My father-in-law reported this conversation with his own father, Rebbe Sholom Dov-Ber, then the Lubavitcher Rebbe:

The Hassid asked: Rebbe, what is a Hassid? The Rebbe answered: A Hassid is a streetlamp lighter.

In olden days, there was a person in every town who would light the gas street-lamps with a light he carried at the end of a long pole. On the street corners, the lamps were there in readiness, waiting to be lit. A streetlamp lighter has a pole with fire. He knows that the fire is not his own, and he goes around lighting all lamps on his route.

Today, the lamps are there, but they need to be lit. It is written, “The soul of man is a lamp of G-d” (Proverbs 20:27), and it is also written, “A mitzvah is a lamp and the Torah is light” (Proverbs 6:23). A Hassid is one who puts personal affairs aside and goes around lighting up the souls of Jews with the light of Torah and mitzvot. Jewish souls are in readiness to be lit. Sometimes they are around the corner. Sometimes they are in a wilderness or at sea. But there must be someone who disregards personal comforts and conveniences and goes out to ignite these lamps with his or her flame. That is the function of a true Hassid. – Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson (Lubavitcher Rebbe from 1950-1994), based on Sichot HaRebbe (Talks of the Rebbe) from the years 5701, 5700, 5722. 
When all Jews have returned to their true Jewish spiritual self, then the messiah has come. No wonder so many Chabad followers regard their dead rebbe (1994) as still alive, as the messiah incarnate. The redemption of all Israel and of the whole world is accomplished a soul at time, a mitzvah at a time, just as the Hanukkah candles are added one each day as the power of their light are broadcast into the darkness at the darkest time of the solar year and the lunar month.

Mixing modern technology for communication and ancient, Chabad arranged a worldwide candlelighting by the rebbe, broadcast by satellite all uniting their worldwide outreach. 
Recently we can “proclaim and propagate the miracle” the world over using a satellite or other scientific inventions to honor God, because as the Rabbis said “everything God created in the world was for his honor” (Pirkei Avot 6).

In fact the ability to see visually by satellite how one person, even a child, can light a candle seen round the world instantaneously teaches us that it is within the power of each one of us to light up the whole world. By satellite we can unite Jews all over the world no matter how dispersed, thus Hanukkah teaches the oneness of Israel, of God and of Torah.

The satellite connection teaches the Jews that what happens in one place can have an effect in any other place, what happens in heaven (satellite) can have an effect on what happens on earth. If it is a mitzvah “to place the candle on the outside of one’s doorway to proclaim the miracle,” then even more so is it a mitzvah to place it “outside” in a central public space for even greater “proclamation of the miracle” – including for the nations of the world, for they too are commanded to observe Torah, the laws of Noah. Of course one’s house should also be a source of light for one’s environment – a house filled with inner spiritual light of Torah, prayer and loving kindness.

The Hanukkah candles we light are comprised of two aspects; a) illuminating the world during the time of exile, and thereby b) preparing the world for the coming redemption. - Rabbi Menachem Schneerson during candle lighting by satellite (1992) 
However Chabad's welcoming embrace of all Jews, observant or not, which is so at odds with most Haredim, is not a sign that they have forsaken the cultural civil war of Hanukkah. The Jew is welcome but not the Jew's heretical beliefs in Western enlightenment or Reform and Conservative Judaism.

Chabad rabbis and President Ronald Reagan at White House
(note four arranged on either side of Reagan, who is the "shamash" in the middle)

A more pluralistic imagery of the Hanukkah candle and the Jewish people can be found in Rav Abraham Kook: 
Everyone must know and understand
that within burns a candle/lamp.
There is no one's candle is like his/her fellow's
and no one lacks their own candle.
Everyone must know and understand
that it is their task to work to reveal the light of that candle in the public realm.
And to ignite it until it is a great flame,
and to illuminate the whole world.

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Prominent Orthodox rabbi calls on Israel to recognize Reform Judaism

Prominent Orthodox rabbi calls on Israel to recognize Reform Judaism

Rabbi Yuval Cherlow says Israel's recognition of Reform Jewry is an existential matter, calls for flexibility in rabbinical law in order to enable absorption of secular Jews in communities abroad.

By Yair Ettinger | Dec.11, 2012 | 2:19 PM 

Rabbi Yuval Cherlow, a prominent Zionist Orthodox rabbi, has said it is necessary to “re-examine” the framework of rabbinical law so that the Jewish communities abroad will be able to absorb more Jews who are not religiously observant. He also called on Israel, for the first time, to recognize non-Orthodox streams of Judaism, including Reform conversions.

In the wake of a visit to the United States, Rabbi Cherlow has written to his students that the fact that the fate of American Jewry is not on the Israeli agenda “is confronting us with a harsh reality in which we are committing suicide, endangering the existence of the state of Israel and moving away from our fundamental role in the world, ‘And all the families of the earth are blessed with you.’”

Rabbi Cherlow holds a number of positions – he is head of the hesder yeshiva (an arrangement combining Torah study and military service for Orthodox males of conscription age) in Petah Tikva, one of the heads of the Tzohar organization of rabbis, a member of the Takana forum board and more. He is considered a leader of the liberal line in the religious public and as someone who often deals publicly with personal and social issues such as the distress of religious gays.

The conservative wing tends to attack him. In 2009 the Internet site Ynet reported a strong statement by another prominent rabbi, Ramat Gan hesder yeshiva head Rabbi Yehoshua Shapira, who bemoaned neo-Reform rabbis in the Orthodox sector, inter alia referring by implication to Cherlow’s ruling that allowed a single religious woman of 36 to become pregnant without getting married in certain conditions. “For this it is necessary to rend – both our garment and the public (as a sign of mourning). We cannot come to terms with Reform!” Shapira said at the time.

Cherlow still keeps his distance from the non-Orthodox streams of Judaism and for years now, for example, he has tried to avoid events at which he would have to sit beside Reform and Conservative speakers, but now he is taking one more step toward dialogue with them.

Upon his return from the United States, he wrote to his students at the hesder yeshiva a letter about his impressions from the trip and especially his impressions of the high rates of assimilation among Jews overseas. He complained that the Torah and the state of Israel are losing their historical roles in shaping the identities of Jews in the diaspora.

The state, wrote the Orthodox rabbi to his students, comes across among non-Orthodox Jews in the United States as “something they don’t want to identify with, because of the occupation, the racism, the control of another people by force … A second reason is the fact that they are not wanted here: The religious movements to which they belong are not recognized and also those who are not affiliated with any stream of Judaism do not want to identify with a state where the Orthodox have a monopoly; their conversions are not recognized, nor are their prayers (Women of the Wall) and so on.”

It should be noted that last month, Union for Reform Judaism president Rabbi Rick Jacobs warned of “the worst kind of disengagement” on the part of American Jewry. Jacobs told Haaretz that the friction in matters of religion and state in Israel, such as the harassment of the Women of the Wall, is leading to a situation in which “North American Jews don’t see an Israel that reflects their core values.”

Cherlow wrote to his students that now it is necessary to have a “definition for the time in rabbinical law,” as for a time of emergency, in which the end justifies the means even if this entails bending or even breaking certain rabbinical rulings. He says this is the first time in his rabbinical legal writing that he has used the principle of “It is time for thee, Lord, to work; for they have made void thy law” (Psalms 119:126), which he proposes to apply as a consideration in rabbinical law on a number of issues.

He notes for example, “driving to a Conservative synagogue on the Sabbath; considerations in conversion; things done by Reb Shlomo Carlebach of blessed memory; bringing Reform Jews into a prayer quorum and in general cooperation with various streams and so on.”

At the same time, Rabbi Cherlow proposes creating separation between the position of rabbinical law and the policy of the state of Israel. On the part of the state, he talks about “a willingness to recognize” the non-Orthodox streams including their conversions and including funding for them in accordance with their size and more. He brings up a proposal – which has also been raised during the past two years both by the movement in Israel and by the Orthodox Ne'emanei Torah Va'Avodah movement – to fund the provision of religious services by the method of the free market and competition among the steams for the hearts of believers in Israel.

According to Cherlow, by such a method “the truth,” by which he means Orthodox Judaism, would retain its primacy: Cherlow calls for “conducting the struggle against them in a free market atmosphere; and increasing separation between religion and politics from within our inner belief that the truth will prevail and does not need the power of the state in order to determine individuals’ status and the like.” According to him, this separation already exists in that the religious public is prepared to embrace any right-wing politician, even if he is far from observing rabbinical law. “Why is this separation,” wrote Cherlow, “not valid with respect to the struggle for the Jewish people?”

Rabbi Gilad Kariv, executive director of the Movement for Progressive Judaism, has told Haaretz in response: “Rabbi Chelow’s remarks give an opening for hope because despite the great disagreements it will be possible in the future to arrive at mutual understandings among all the streams of Judaism on a basis of mutual respect.” Kariv added: “It is to be hoped that this statement will not remain in the theoretical realm only but will lead to support from significant figures in Orthodox Zionism for a change in the relations between religions and state and to the advancement of the state's recognition of all the streams and colorations of Judaism.”

Monday, December 10, 2012

The Right Way to Play The Game: Keep Our True Goals In Mind By Rabbi DONNIEL HARTMAN (president Hartman institute Jerusalem)


The Right Way to Play The Game: Keep Our True Goals In Mind By Rabbi DONNIEL HARTMAN (president Hartman institute Jerusalem)

The game, Red Light, Green Light 1-2-3, like most children's games, has clear rules, an achievable goal, and is relatively easy to play. The goal is to be the first one to touch the wall without one's progress being detected. To succeed one must take small, incremental steps, coupled with moments of boldness when the opportunity arises. An interesting feature of this game is that one doesn’t get to determine for oneself whether one has been caught moving. It is a game of interaction in which someone else reviews one's actions and calls you on them. Individual protests, such as, "I wasn't moving," or "You didn't see me," are of no avail, unless, of course, one wants to break up the game.

There is often something very childish about the way Middle Eastern politics plays itself out, and it has often been compared to playground squabbles. The problem with this analogy is two-fold. The deadly consequences of "the game" and what is at stake is one of them. The second is that in the playground, one's actions are defined by the goals, which are agreed upon and very clear: for example, in "Red Light, Green Light," to be the first to touch the wall. One of the great failings of both Palestinian and Israeli actions this past week is that we aren't functioning adequately even by playground standards.

Both Israeli and Palestinian leadership have professed loyalty to the following aspirations and goals: for Palestinians, to achieve real, national independence and prosperity for their people alongside Israel; for Israelis, to attain real peace and viable security within the context of a two-state solution. If this is truly agreed upon, the question is, "how to touch the wall" together.

If Palestinians are really committed to national independence alongside Israel, negotiations with Israel would be the self-evident and recognized path to achieve this end. Unilateral action is never conducive to the cooperation and partnership essential for a viable Palestinian entity alongside Israel. If Israel's aim is to achieve peace and security within the context of a two-state solution, at the very least, no policy would be adopted which would sabotage this aspiration. Settlement expansion which undermines the viability of an independent Palestinian state and our ability to one day separate from each other into two distinct entities is simply self-destructive to Israel's own stated goals. Instead of playing with each other we seem to be more committed to playing by ourselves, to adopting actions which "play well" to the home audiences but get us no closer to our goals.


As a Jew and as an Israeli, I am deeply frustrated by much of the actions of the Palestinian Authority and leadership and have serious doubts as to the Palestinian people's commitment to live alongside me in mutual peace and security. This has caused many of us here in Israel to question whether our goals are achievable in our lifetime. In this context, it is understandable to respond with caution and to avoid potentially self-destructive policies which put Israel at risk. It is another thing altogether, to be self-destructive and to put our own goals at risk.

The dramatic declaration of Israel's government on settlement expansion this week is akin to making a bold dash in "Red Light, Green Light," but running in the wrong direction. Settlement expansion within the settlement blocs and in Jerusalem is one thing, and is in accord with a very broad Israeli consensus, commensurate with our and much of the world's notion of the borders which will ultimately demarcate the two-state solution. Settlement building in E-1 or in any area which will eventually be a part of the future Palestinian state is simply stupid, harmful to Israel, and legitimately questions what game we are really playing.

When Israel's actions reflect our legitimate security concerns and we act in a measured and thoughtful manner toward a clear and justifiable goal, as we saw in the recent Operation Pillar of Defense, not only are we not called "out," but we find ourselves supported by our friends around the world. We can make a case regarding our significant security concerns in the context of a future Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria alongside Israel. We can also make a case that realities on the ground, such as the settlement blocs and Jerusalem where 80 percent of the settlers live, whether initially justifiable or not, must factor into any future border demarcations. When we make these cases, and only these cases, we clearly align ourselves with the values of peace, human dignity, freedom, and democracy on which the State of Israel is founded. When we make these cases, and only these cases, we align ourselves with the best of what our tradition stands for. When we do so we are also not alone.

However, when we align ourselves with policies devoid of vision and hope, policies grounded on our own internal narratives of holiness of the land and messianic politics, policies which pander to shallow nationalistic delusions in an election season, we have no case to make. It should not take us by surprise, therefore, that in light of our recent decision we find ourselves aligned with no one and playing alone. Just as in “Red Light, Green Light” it is useless to argue, "I didn't move," it will be futile for Israel to attempt to justify its recent decision. This is not faulty public relations but faulty policy. It was a power play aimed at responding to a Palestinian power play. It was not merely inappropriate for the playground, but unbefitting to the State of Israel and our values.

Israel was founded on a noble and large dream. Our future will be secured when we stay loyal to our foundations and aspirations. As in "Red Light, Green Light," we have to move cautiously. However, if we want to win, truly win, and by that I mean to create a viable, productive, prosperous Jewish democratic state at peace with our neighbors, we are also going to have to keep our eyes open for opportunities to dare, when a bold move can change the outcome. Let's play this game. Let's play it well. Let's always remember our true goals. If we do so, we will constantly progress is the right direction. There will be stops and starts, and at times we will be sent back to the beginning. But at the end, we will touch the wall together.

Thursday, December 6, 2012

The right is a danger to Israel

The right is a danger to Israel

An Israel that insists on national pride but that is harming national security and eroding national fortitude in a dangerous way.

By Ari Shavit Dec.06, 2012 | 3:48 AM 

Let's set aside values. Are we indeed prepared to reinforce our status as an occupying state that controls another people for a prolonged period? Let's set aside justice and morals. Are we indeed prepared to turn Zionism into an apartheid movement that denies millions of residents their basic rights? Let's set aside identity. Are we indeed prepared to exchange a Jewish democratic state for a state of ultra-nationalist zealotry that tramples on its minorities?

Let's set aside universal values, and Jewish values, and what Israel once aspired to be. In terms of national security, the political map that seems to be shaping up arouses aversion. The sharp right turn that the ruling party and its partners have taken is endangering the Jewish state's diplomatic, security and economic interests. It is likely to lead to a situation in which, very soon, Israel loses the last few bases of support it has left in the West and becomes a state that weakens itself to death.

Iran? Iran. The government that Benjamin Netanyahu, Avigdor Lieberman and Zeev Elkin can set up will have the most limited ability to deal with the Iranian nuclear challenge.  Since it will be conceived of in the West as an irrational government, no one will want to listen to its rational claims on the irrationality of Tehran. Since it will be conceived of as an illegitimate government of a country that is gradually becoming illegitimate, it will not have the necessary legitimacy to curb Iran, either diplomatically or militarily. An Israel that is controlled by "ultra-nationalism-is-our-home" parties will be an Israel that is isolated and weakened, whose ability to prevent the nuclearization of Iran is slim.

Deterrence? Deterrence. A government whose values are those of Likud MK Yariv Levin will be conceived of in the international community as if it were a government of Afrikaners. The Afrikaners do not have the right to self-determination and self-defense.  Since they do not recognize the natural rights of others, their natural rights too are undermined. That being the case, the ability of the Israeli Afrikaners to use force against Hamas and Hezbollah will be close to nil. Any justifiable act of defense on their part will be seen as a war crime. Any wild settlement project will take them to the international court in The Hague. A Netanyahu painted in the hues of Levin will not enjoy the same umbrella of sympathy and forgiveness that Shimon Peres enjoyed with the Oslo Accords, or Ariel Sharon with the "road map," or Ehud Olmert with the Annapolis talks. With a backward kind of logic, precisely this ultra-nationalist leadership that strives to be strong will be the weak leadership of a weak country whose strategic situation is in dire straits.

Economics? Economics. The bitter herbs that the European Union is dishing out to us this week are merely the first course. Let's not get things wrong: Everything was planned in advance and known in advance. While the prime minister and foreign minister were busy celebrating the fact that they had prevented the diplomatic tsunami of 2011, the Palestinians, Europeans and Americans were working diligently to prepare the diplomatic tsunami of 2012 and 2013. All they were waiting for was the reelection of Barack Obama as America's president. Now, when the Democratic regime in the United States is stable and sure, there is no Sheldon Adelson in the world who can hold back a coalition of progressive forces in the West with zero tolerance for a continuation of the occupation and settlements.
If the wild construction in the territories continues, the diplomatic protest gestures will soon become legal and commercial protest gestures that will badly harm the Israeli economy. Supporters of the Likud will learn the hard way that there is a price tag to electing Moshe Feiglin, and the citizens of Israel will learn the hard way that there is a price tag to electing Feiglin's devoted supporters.

Thin out your stock portfolio, dear readers. The Israel of Likud Beitenu is an Israel that is going to crash into the wall. In another month and a half, Israelis will go to the polls. To our great regret, they won't find in the voting booths a worthy and high-quality alternative in the center-left bloc. But whoever votes for the extremist slates of the new right-wing bloc must know exactly what he is voting for - a weak Israel. An Israel that insists on national pride but that is harming national security and eroding national fortitude in a dangerous way.

Monday, December 3, 2012

Israel's Punishment


Israel's punishment

The other side said its piece loud and clear: Yes to a two-state solution. But Israel's government responded with a step that, first and foremost, punishes Israel.

Haaretz Editorial | Dec.02, 2012 | 2:23 AM | 



The government decided this weekend to build another 3,000 housing units in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, and also to move ahead with planning and building procedures for the E1 area, located between Jerusalem and the West Bank settlement of Ma'aleh Adumim. That is how the government responded to the UN General Assembly's decision to recognize Palestine as a nonmember observer state; that is how the government decided to punish the Palestinians and the world.

The latter said its piece loud and clear: Yes to a two-state solution. But Israel's government responded with a step that, first and foremost, punishes Israel. The only positive aspect of this decision is the fact that Israel has recognized that the settlements are indeed a punishment.

This is a particularly grave and dangerous decision. Instead of internalizing the fact that a sweeping majority of nations are sick of the Israeli occupation and want a Palestinian state, Israel is entrenching itself even further in its own rejectionism, and deepening its isolation and the disconnect between itself and the international reality. Instead of drawing the necessary conclusions from its resounding failure, the government is dragging Israel into additional diplomatic disasters. And instead of embarking on sincere, genuine negotiations with the new observer state, Israel is turning its back on it, and on the world.

The government's decision is the last nail in the coffin of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Bar-Ilan University speech in 2009. It is proof positive that this speech, in which he ostensibly accepted the principle of two states, was merely a deception. What is particularly astounding, however, is the violation of Israel's commitment to the United States not to build in E1, given that construction there would preclude the establishment of a contiguous Palestinian state in the West Bank. After America was left as virtually the last supporter of Israel's position at the United Nations, Israel is repaying it with a resounding slap in the face.

Israel's decision is also a slap in the face to another loyal friend, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who explained Germany's abstention in the vote as stemming from Israel's refusal to stop construction in the territories. So, even before the next election, in which the joint "Likud-Beiteinu" ticket is presenting an especially right-wing, extremist slate, Netanyahu has already signaled where he is heading: toward extremism, diplomatic isolation, denunciation and ostracism by the world.

The world - even including the United States this time - can't allow Israel's arrogant response to pass quietly. This very government decision might serve as a spur to those who want to transfer the settlements issue to the International Criminal Court in The Hague, as punishment for the "punishment" imposed by Israel. And the next time Israel needs the world's help, on the Iranian issue or on any other, the world will remember this decision.