Monday, December 17, 2012

Friday December 14, 2012 at the Western Wall (Dramatized)

Friday December 14, 2012 at the Western Wall (Dramatized)

December 17, 2012

Policeman: Open your coat. Is this a shawl you are wearing?

Woman: Are shawls a problem?

Policeman: Shawls are allowed. I am looking for a tallit.

Woman: Why?

Policeman: As of this morning the Rabbi of the Wall is forbidding tallitot at the Kotel.

Woman: But wait, over there is a man carrying a tallit?

Policeman: The decree applies only to women. Open your bag please. I need to search for a tallit.


Dear Rabbi,

Last Friday we saw gender segregation once again rear its ugly head. During a service at the Western Wall four more women were detained. We have seen this many times in the past, but this month the police tried a new tactic. They decided to collect "offensive" religious items from women before they entered the Western Wall complex.

Despite the authorities' best efforts some women were able to have their tallitot smuggled in by male supporters. The Jerusalem police managed to “protect” the Kotel from Rabbi Elyse Frishman, who is the editor of the Reform prayer book Mishkan Tefila, a board member from Women of the Wall, and two 18-year-old students from the UK in Israel on a NETZER program.

We need your help to keep up the pressure on the Israeli government to make the Western Wall a home for Jews from all denominations.  Add your signature to nearly 30,000 others demanding freedom of worship and pluralism at the holiest site for the Jewish people. Get 10 of your friends to sign. It's easy. It's effective.

When simple items of Judaica become contraband it's time to liberate the Kotel.

L’shalom,
Anat Hoffman,
Executive Director, IRAC

Action Alert: Help the petition grow

Please click here to sign our Kotel Petition. After you have signed come back to this email to help us grow the petition even further. You can help us by collecting 10 additional signatures by forwarding this link to your friends, forwarding this email, or click here to use our special Tell a Friend link.

Prayer for the people of Connecticut


Master of the universe, send Your blessing to the people of Connecticut, to the grieving mothers and fathers, and to the traumatized children.
Please, oh Merciful God, have compassion on us!
Spread Your shelter of peace over the people of Connecticut and over all of us,

.Grant them healing and comfort
May they find strength and courage in the days ahead.

May our voices carry prayers of hope
That the people of Connecticut know that they are not alone.
We mourn the fallen, and our hearts are pained by the grief of the survivors.
Give them comfort and strengthen their endeavors to restore their lives. Heal their bodies and redeem their spirits. Grant wisdom and strength to all who provide help. Grant them light, guide their path, and protect them.

We pray for the day when the bloodshed will end and there will be Shalom!
And let us say ‘Amen’.

On the 6th day of Hanuka, celebrating Rosh Hodesh Tevet, four women were arrested at Judaism's holiest site, praying while wearing tallitot.


On the 6th day of Hanuka, celebrating Rosh Hodesh Tevet, four women were arrested at Judaism's holiest site, praying while wearing tallitot.  

The World Union for Progressive Judaism notes with sadness the treatment received at the hands of Israeli Police who arrested Rabbi Elyse Frishman (senior rabbi of Barnert Temple in Franklin Lakes, New Jersey and a member of the WUPJ Rabbinic Circle, see video below), and two 18 year old women from the UK who were in Israel for the World Union sponsored Netzer Gap-Year Program, as well as a board member of Women of the Wall.  These women, and all others assembled there, were simply trying to pray.  

We join with our Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism in calling for a third section to be created in which men and women can pray together, while respecting the rights of those who chose to pray in separate sections. How ironic that as Jews around the world celebrate the victory of spirit over forced assimilation, that Jews who want to pray have their rights denied by an ultra-orthodox hegemony. We call upon the State to heed its own Supreme Court and find a resolution.   Until that happens, Israel still fails to live up to the ideals upon which it was founded, as a haven for Jews everywhere.  

We support the efforts of the Women of the Wall and our hearts, and our support, go out to those who stood up in the face of injustice for the sake of the greater Jewish community. 

Reform Movement Dismayed by Continued Religious Discrimination in Israel

Reform Movement Dismayed by Continued Religious Discrimination in Israel

Contact: Jo Ann Mort
joann.mort@gmail.com
718-954-0352


New York, NY, December 14, 2012 – Friday morning, Israeli police detained four women as they prayed at the Western Wall in Jerusalem. The group of 138 men and women was organized by Women of the Wall, an organization that fights for women's right to pray freely, while donning prayer shawls and other religious articles, at the Western Wall. Among those detained was Reform Rabbi Elyse Frishman, senior rabbi of Barnert Temple in Franklin Lakes, NJ, the oldest synagogue in New Jersey and editor of the Reform Movement's siddur (prayer book), CCAR's Mishkan T'filah, used in over 700 North American congregations.

In response to these detentions, URJ President Rabbi Rick Jacobs said, "The Reform Movement is shocked and disappointed by the continuous discrimination against non-Orthodox worshipers at the Western Wall, the holiest site for Jews. The Kotel should be open to the entire Jewish people and must not be used as a tool of division. We urge the Israeli government to repeal these discriminatory policies and be true to the democratic ideals on which the state was founded. This incident is a visible reminder of what non-Orthodox Jews face every day in Israel. Because of our deep love for Israel we are committed to ensuring that Jews are free to practice Judaism in whichever way they choose."

Rabbi Marla J. Feldman, executive director of Women of Reform Judaism, said, "The Western Wall should be a place that unites the Jewish people, where all responsible, courteous worshipers are welcomed and respected. Women of Reform Judaism will visit the Kotel with Women of the Wall in March as part of our organization's centennial celebration. We hope to be able to pray freely there with our Israeli sisters."

Central Conference of American Rabbis (CCAR) Chief Executive Rabbi Steve Fox and Chairman of ARZA Rabbi Bennett Miller, affirm their support for Rabbi Frishman, one of the leading rabbis of the Reform Movement, and affirm the Reform rabbinate's historic commitment to religious pluralism in Israel and the continuing need to advance the rights of women throughout the world.

Early this morning, a new decree was issued forbidding women to enter the Kotel with religious articles, including prayer shawls and phylacteries; women bearing these articles were searched and stripped of them at a security checkpoint.

In October, police intervened as women, including Anat Hoffman, executive director of the Israel Religious Action Center and chairwoman of Women of the Wall, prayed at the Western Wall.  Hoffman was arrested and charged with the "offense" of wearing a prayer shawl and disturbing public order.

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Reinventing Hanukkah: Lubavitch Looks for the Inner and Outer Light

Reinventing Hanukkah: Lubavitch Looks for the Inner and Outer Light

By NOAM ZION

Under the missionary Lubavitcher rebbe Menahem Mendel Schneersohn in Brooklyn, CHaBaD (Chohkma, Binah, v’Da’at, an acronym of highest and more abstract spheres of the mystical Godhead) has reinvented Hanukkah in ways dialectically related to the Reform and Zionist Hanukkah.

These and only these Hasidim have chosen this holiday to carry their chief ideological and strategic message for Jewish survival and renaissance in the 20th and 21st centuries. For the Reform movement, Hanukkah symbolizes the light of religious liberty shared by Jews and enlightened Americans in contradistinction to benighted obscurantist religion. Therefore the "wall of separation" between church and state which Thomas Jefferson wished to build must keep the public space clear of religious symbols like the Christmas creche, while proud Jews may demonstrate their belief in that value in their homes and synagogues.

But American Chabad places its menorahs – electric, for the most part – on the White House lawn, at the most conspicuous public intersections and even on highways in Florida. Now Chabad knows that such menorahs do not fulfill the mitzvah of lighting candles in your home on the threshold. But they see this as an extension of the mitzvah of publicizing the miracle.

While many Reform Jews are scandalized by this violation of their American democratic faith and fearful that it invites Bible Belt Christians to reconquer the public space, Lubavitchers see it as an assertion of visceral Jewish pride that disregards the desire for conformism and assimilation typical of modern day Hellenists and their obsequies surrender to the darkness of Greek, that is, Western values: 
The Error of Greek Ways

Some people think that Hanukkah is chiefly about a military victory. However, while the military victory was essential, it was a means to the final purpose of purifying the Temple, spiritual survival. In short, the point is to remove Greek pagan influence and spread light of holiness.

Greek culture has two faces. Outwardly it is brilliant and attractive. Inwardly it is rotten and corrupt. It is the culture of sports, circuses and theater. Nevertheless, even in Eretz Yisrael there were Jews who wanted to assimilate, “to live it up” as Hellenists. Hagei Yisrael for Youth, Lubavitch Center for Education
Like Secular Zionists who reclaim the militancy of Judah the Maccabee, Chabad organizes its youth movement in quasi-military fashion, calling it Tzivos HaShem, the Armies of God, and assigning children ranks, as in the army. It sends forth missionaries in Mitzvah “anks” to reconquer secularized Jews by bringing them the light of Torah wherever they may be in the world, from Mumbai to Machu Picchu to Bangkok. The enemy, however, is not hostile Arabs, and the goal is not political independence, but an internal cultural religious civil war with non-Orthodox rabbis and wholly assimilated and hence extinguished Jewish souls (neshama).
Material for this article and the others in this series is adapted from Noam Zion's book, A Different Light, The Hanukkah Book of Celebration.

Lubavitch outreach uses the shamash, the servant candle of the menorah which lights the eight sacred candles, as its symbol – to light the candle is to ignite the lost soul of a Jew who still possesses the "pintele yid," the Jewish spark: 
My father-in-law reported this conversation with his own father, Rebbe Sholom Dov-Ber, then the Lubavitcher Rebbe:

The Hassid asked: Rebbe, what is a Hassid? The Rebbe answered: A Hassid is a streetlamp lighter.

In olden days, there was a person in every town who would light the gas street-lamps with a light he carried at the end of a long pole. On the street corners, the lamps were there in readiness, waiting to be lit. A streetlamp lighter has a pole with fire. He knows that the fire is not his own, and he goes around lighting all lamps on his route.

Today, the lamps are there, but they need to be lit. It is written, “The soul of man is a lamp of G-d” (Proverbs 20:27), and it is also written, “A mitzvah is a lamp and the Torah is light” (Proverbs 6:23). A Hassid is one who puts personal affairs aside and goes around lighting up the souls of Jews with the light of Torah and mitzvot. Jewish souls are in readiness to be lit. Sometimes they are around the corner. Sometimes they are in a wilderness or at sea. But there must be someone who disregards personal comforts and conveniences and goes out to ignite these lamps with his or her flame. That is the function of a true Hassid. – Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson (Lubavitcher Rebbe from 1950-1994), based on Sichot HaRebbe (Talks of the Rebbe) from the years 5701, 5700, 5722. 
When all Jews have returned to their true Jewish spiritual self, then the messiah has come. No wonder so many Chabad followers regard their dead rebbe (1994) as still alive, as the messiah incarnate. The redemption of all Israel and of the whole world is accomplished a soul at time, a mitzvah at a time, just as the Hanukkah candles are added one each day as the power of their light are broadcast into the darkness at the darkest time of the solar year and the lunar month.

Mixing modern technology for communication and ancient, Chabad arranged a worldwide candlelighting by the rebbe, broadcast by satellite all uniting their worldwide outreach. 
Recently we can “proclaim and propagate the miracle” the world over using a satellite or other scientific inventions to honor God, because as the Rabbis said “everything God created in the world was for his honor” (Pirkei Avot 6).

In fact the ability to see visually by satellite how one person, even a child, can light a candle seen round the world instantaneously teaches us that it is within the power of each one of us to light up the whole world. By satellite we can unite Jews all over the world no matter how dispersed, thus Hanukkah teaches the oneness of Israel, of God and of Torah.

The satellite connection teaches the Jews that what happens in one place can have an effect in any other place, what happens in heaven (satellite) can have an effect on what happens on earth. If it is a mitzvah “to place the candle on the outside of one’s doorway to proclaim the miracle,” then even more so is it a mitzvah to place it “outside” in a central public space for even greater “proclamation of the miracle” – including for the nations of the world, for they too are commanded to observe Torah, the laws of Noah. Of course one’s house should also be a source of light for one’s environment – a house filled with inner spiritual light of Torah, prayer and loving kindness.

The Hanukkah candles we light are comprised of two aspects; a) illuminating the world during the time of exile, and thereby b) preparing the world for the coming redemption. - Rabbi Menachem Schneerson during candle lighting by satellite (1992) 
However Chabad's welcoming embrace of all Jews, observant or not, which is so at odds with most Haredim, is not a sign that they have forsaken the cultural civil war of Hanukkah. The Jew is welcome but not the Jew's heretical beliefs in Western enlightenment or Reform and Conservative Judaism.

Chabad rabbis and President Ronald Reagan at White House
(note four arranged on either side of Reagan, who is the "shamash" in the middle)

A more pluralistic imagery of the Hanukkah candle and the Jewish people can be found in Rav Abraham Kook: 
Everyone must know and understand
that within burns a candle/lamp.
There is no one's candle is like his/her fellow's
and no one lacks their own candle.
Everyone must know and understand
that it is their task to work to reveal the light of that candle in the public realm.
And to ignite it until it is a great flame,
and to illuminate the whole world.

Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Prominent Orthodox rabbi calls on Israel to recognize Reform Judaism

Prominent Orthodox rabbi calls on Israel to recognize Reform Judaism

Rabbi Yuval Cherlow says Israel's recognition of Reform Jewry is an existential matter, calls for flexibility in rabbinical law in order to enable absorption of secular Jews in communities abroad.

By Yair Ettinger | Dec.11, 2012 | 2:19 PM 

Rabbi Yuval Cherlow, a prominent Zionist Orthodox rabbi, has said it is necessary to “re-examine” the framework of rabbinical law so that the Jewish communities abroad will be able to absorb more Jews who are not religiously observant. He also called on Israel, for the first time, to recognize non-Orthodox streams of Judaism, including Reform conversions.

In the wake of a visit to the United States, Rabbi Cherlow has written to his students that the fact that the fate of American Jewry is not on the Israeli agenda “is confronting us with a harsh reality in which we are committing suicide, endangering the existence of the state of Israel and moving away from our fundamental role in the world, ‘And all the families of the earth are blessed with you.’”

Rabbi Cherlow holds a number of positions – he is head of the hesder yeshiva (an arrangement combining Torah study and military service for Orthodox males of conscription age) in Petah Tikva, one of the heads of the Tzohar organization of rabbis, a member of the Takana forum board and more. He is considered a leader of the liberal line in the religious public and as someone who often deals publicly with personal and social issues such as the distress of religious gays.

The conservative wing tends to attack him. In 2009 the Internet site Ynet reported a strong statement by another prominent rabbi, Ramat Gan hesder yeshiva head Rabbi Yehoshua Shapira, who bemoaned neo-Reform rabbis in the Orthodox sector, inter alia referring by implication to Cherlow’s ruling that allowed a single religious woman of 36 to become pregnant without getting married in certain conditions. “For this it is necessary to rend – both our garment and the public (as a sign of mourning). We cannot come to terms with Reform!” Shapira said at the time.

Cherlow still keeps his distance from the non-Orthodox streams of Judaism and for years now, for example, he has tried to avoid events at which he would have to sit beside Reform and Conservative speakers, but now he is taking one more step toward dialogue with them.

Upon his return from the United States, he wrote to his students at the hesder yeshiva a letter about his impressions from the trip and especially his impressions of the high rates of assimilation among Jews overseas. He complained that the Torah and the state of Israel are losing their historical roles in shaping the identities of Jews in the diaspora.

The state, wrote the Orthodox rabbi to his students, comes across among non-Orthodox Jews in the United States as “something they don’t want to identify with, because of the occupation, the racism, the control of another people by force … A second reason is the fact that they are not wanted here: The religious movements to which they belong are not recognized and also those who are not affiliated with any stream of Judaism do not want to identify with a state where the Orthodox have a monopoly; their conversions are not recognized, nor are their prayers (Women of the Wall) and so on.”

It should be noted that last month, Union for Reform Judaism president Rabbi Rick Jacobs warned of “the worst kind of disengagement” on the part of American Jewry. Jacobs told Haaretz that the friction in matters of religion and state in Israel, such as the harassment of the Women of the Wall, is leading to a situation in which “North American Jews don’t see an Israel that reflects their core values.”

Cherlow wrote to his students that now it is necessary to have a “definition for the time in rabbinical law,” as for a time of emergency, in which the end justifies the means even if this entails bending or even breaking certain rabbinical rulings. He says this is the first time in his rabbinical legal writing that he has used the principle of “It is time for thee, Lord, to work; for they have made void thy law” (Psalms 119:126), which he proposes to apply as a consideration in rabbinical law on a number of issues.

He notes for example, “driving to a Conservative synagogue on the Sabbath; considerations in conversion; things done by Reb Shlomo Carlebach of blessed memory; bringing Reform Jews into a prayer quorum and in general cooperation with various streams and so on.”

At the same time, Rabbi Cherlow proposes creating separation between the position of rabbinical law and the policy of the state of Israel. On the part of the state, he talks about “a willingness to recognize” the non-Orthodox streams including their conversions and including funding for them in accordance with their size and more. He brings up a proposal – which has also been raised during the past two years both by the movement in Israel and by the Orthodox Ne'emanei Torah Va'Avodah movement – to fund the provision of religious services by the method of the free market and competition among the steams for the hearts of believers in Israel.

According to Cherlow, by such a method “the truth,” by which he means Orthodox Judaism, would retain its primacy: Cherlow calls for “conducting the struggle against them in a free market atmosphere; and increasing separation between religion and politics from within our inner belief that the truth will prevail and does not need the power of the state in order to determine individuals’ status and the like.” According to him, this separation already exists in that the religious public is prepared to embrace any right-wing politician, even if he is far from observing rabbinical law. “Why is this separation,” wrote Cherlow, “not valid with respect to the struggle for the Jewish people?”

Rabbi Gilad Kariv, executive director of the Movement for Progressive Judaism, has told Haaretz in response: “Rabbi Chelow’s remarks give an opening for hope because despite the great disagreements it will be possible in the future to arrive at mutual understandings among all the streams of Judaism on a basis of mutual respect.” Kariv added: “It is to be hoped that this statement will not remain in the theoretical realm only but will lead to support from significant figures in Orthodox Zionism for a change in the relations between religions and state and to the advancement of the state's recognition of all the streams and colorations of Judaism.”

Monday, December 10, 2012

The Right Way to Play The Game: Keep Our True Goals In Mind By Rabbi DONNIEL HARTMAN (president Hartman institute Jerusalem)


The Right Way to Play The Game: Keep Our True Goals In Mind By Rabbi DONNIEL HARTMAN (president Hartman institute Jerusalem)

The game, Red Light, Green Light 1-2-3, like most children's games, has clear rules, an achievable goal, and is relatively easy to play. The goal is to be the first one to touch the wall without one's progress being detected. To succeed one must take small, incremental steps, coupled with moments of boldness when the opportunity arises. An interesting feature of this game is that one doesn’t get to determine for oneself whether one has been caught moving. It is a game of interaction in which someone else reviews one's actions and calls you on them. Individual protests, such as, "I wasn't moving," or "You didn't see me," are of no avail, unless, of course, one wants to break up the game.

There is often something very childish about the way Middle Eastern politics plays itself out, and it has often been compared to playground squabbles. The problem with this analogy is two-fold. The deadly consequences of "the game" and what is at stake is one of them. The second is that in the playground, one's actions are defined by the goals, which are agreed upon and very clear: for example, in "Red Light, Green Light," to be the first to touch the wall. One of the great failings of both Palestinian and Israeli actions this past week is that we aren't functioning adequately even by playground standards.

Both Israeli and Palestinian leadership have professed loyalty to the following aspirations and goals: for Palestinians, to achieve real, national independence and prosperity for their people alongside Israel; for Israelis, to attain real peace and viable security within the context of a two-state solution. If this is truly agreed upon, the question is, "how to touch the wall" together.

If Palestinians are really committed to national independence alongside Israel, negotiations with Israel would be the self-evident and recognized path to achieve this end. Unilateral action is never conducive to the cooperation and partnership essential for a viable Palestinian entity alongside Israel. If Israel's aim is to achieve peace and security within the context of a two-state solution, at the very least, no policy would be adopted which would sabotage this aspiration. Settlement expansion which undermines the viability of an independent Palestinian state and our ability to one day separate from each other into two distinct entities is simply self-destructive to Israel's own stated goals. Instead of playing with each other we seem to be more committed to playing by ourselves, to adopting actions which "play well" to the home audiences but get us no closer to our goals.


As a Jew and as an Israeli, I am deeply frustrated by much of the actions of the Palestinian Authority and leadership and have serious doubts as to the Palestinian people's commitment to live alongside me in mutual peace and security. This has caused many of us here in Israel to question whether our goals are achievable in our lifetime. In this context, it is understandable to respond with caution and to avoid potentially self-destructive policies which put Israel at risk. It is another thing altogether, to be self-destructive and to put our own goals at risk.

The dramatic declaration of Israel's government on settlement expansion this week is akin to making a bold dash in "Red Light, Green Light," but running in the wrong direction. Settlement expansion within the settlement blocs and in Jerusalem is one thing, and is in accord with a very broad Israeli consensus, commensurate with our and much of the world's notion of the borders which will ultimately demarcate the two-state solution. Settlement building in E-1 or in any area which will eventually be a part of the future Palestinian state is simply stupid, harmful to Israel, and legitimately questions what game we are really playing.

When Israel's actions reflect our legitimate security concerns and we act in a measured and thoughtful manner toward a clear and justifiable goal, as we saw in the recent Operation Pillar of Defense, not only are we not called "out," but we find ourselves supported by our friends around the world. We can make a case regarding our significant security concerns in the context of a future Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria alongside Israel. We can also make a case that realities on the ground, such as the settlement blocs and Jerusalem where 80 percent of the settlers live, whether initially justifiable or not, must factor into any future border demarcations. When we make these cases, and only these cases, we clearly align ourselves with the values of peace, human dignity, freedom, and democracy on which the State of Israel is founded. When we make these cases, and only these cases, we align ourselves with the best of what our tradition stands for. When we do so we are also not alone.

However, when we align ourselves with policies devoid of vision and hope, policies grounded on our own internal narratives of holiness of the land and messianic politics, policies which pander to shallow nationalistic delusions in an election season, we have no case to make. It should not take us by surprise, therefore, that in light of our recent decision we find ourselves aligned with no one and playing alone. Just as in “Red Light, Green Light” it is useless to argue, "I didn't move," it will be futile for Israel to attempt to justify its recent decision. This is not faulty public relations but faulty policy. It was a power play aimed at responding to a Palestinian power play. It was not merely inappropriate for the playground, but unbefitting to the State of Israel and our values.

Israel was founded on a noble and large dream. Our future will be secured when we stay loyal to our foundations and aspirations. As in "Red Light, Green Light," we have to move cautiously. However, if we want to win, truly win, and by that I mean to create a viable, productive, prosperous Jewish democratic state at peace with our neighbors, we are also going to have to keep our eyes open for opportunities to dare, when a bold move can change the outcome. Let's play this game. Let's play it well. Let's always remember our true goals. If we do so, we will constantly progress is the right direction. There will be stops and starts, and at times we will be sent back to the beginning. But at the end, we will touch the wall together.

Thursday, December 6, 2012

The right is a danger to Israel

The right is a danger to Israel

An Israel that insists on national pride but that is harming national security and eroding national fortitude in a dangerous way.

By Ari Shavit Dec.06, 2012 | 3:48 AM 

Let's set aside values. Are we indeed prepared to reinforce our status as an occupying state that controls another people for a prolonged period? Let's set aside justice and morals. Are we indeed prepared to turn Zionism into an apartheid movement that denies millions of residents their basic rights? Let's set aside identity. Are we indeed prepared to exchange a Jewish democratic state for a state of ultra-nationalist zealotry that tramples on its minorities?

Let's set aside universal values, and Jewish values, and what Israel once aspired to be. In terms of national security, the political map that seems to be shaping up arouses aversion. The sharp right turn that the ruling party and its partners have taken is endangering the Jewish state's diplomatic, security and economic interests. It is likely to lead to a situation in which, very soon, Israel loses the last few bases of support it has left in the West and becomes a state that weakens itself to death.

Iran? Iran. The government that Benjamin Netanyahu, Avigdor Lieberman and Zeev Elkin can set up will have the most limited ability to deal with the Iranian nuclear challenge.  Since it will be conceived of in the West as an irrational government, no one will want to listen to its rational claims on the irrationality of Tehran. Since it will be conceived of as an illegitimate government of a country that is gradually becoming illegitimate, it will not have the necessary legitimacy to curb Iran, either diplomatically or militarily. An Israel that is controlled by "ultra-nationalism-is-our-home" parties will be an Israel that is isolated and weakened, whose ability to prevent the nuclearization of Iran is slim.

Deterrence? Deterrence. A government whose values are those of Likud MK Yariv Levin will be conceived of in the international community as if it were a government of Afrikaners. The Afrikaners do not have the right to self-determination and self-defense.  Since they do not recognize the natural rights of others, their natural rights too are undermined. That being the case, the ability of the Israeli Afrikaners to use force against Hamas and Hezbollah will be close to nil. Any justifiable act of defense on their part will be seen as a war crime. Any wild settlement project will take them to the international court in The Hague. A Netanyahu painted in the hues of Levin will not enjoy the same umbrella of sympathy and forgiveness that Shimon Peres enjoyed with the Oslo Accords, or Ariel Sharon with the "road map," or Ehud Olmert with the Annapolis talks. With a backward kind of logic, precisely this ultra-nationalist leadership that strives to be strong will be the weak leadership of a weak country whose strategic situation is in dire straits.

Economics? Economics. The bitter herbs that the European Union is dishing out to us this week are merely the first course. Let's not get things wrong: Everything was planned in advance and known in advance. While the prime minister and foreign minister were busy celebrating the fact that they had prevented the diplomatic tsunami of 2011, the Palestinians, Europeans and Americans were working diligently to prepare the diplomatic tsunami of 2012 and 2013. All they were waiting for was the reelection of Barack Obama as America's president. Now, when the Democratic regime in the United States is stable and sure, there is no Sheldon Adelson in the world who can hold back a coalition of progressive forces in the West with zero tolerance for a continuation of the occupation and settlements.
If the wild construction in the territories continues, the diplomatic protest gestures will soon become legal and commercial protest gestures that will badly harm the Israeli economy. Supporters of the Likud will learn the hard way that there is a price tag to electing Moshe Feiglin, and the citizens of Israel will learn the hard way that there is a price tag to electing Feiglin's devoted supporters.

Thin out your stock portfolio, dear readers. The Israel of Likud Beitenu is an Israel that is going to crash into the wall. In another month and a half, Israelis will go to the polls. To our great regret, they won't find in the voting booths a worthy and high-quality alternative in the center-left bloc. But whoever votes for the extremist slates of the new right-wing bloc must know exactly what he is voting for - a weak Israel. An Israel that insists on national pride but that is harming national security and eroding national fortitude in a dangerous way.

Monday, December 3, 2012

Israel's Punishment


Israel's punishment

The other side said its piece loud and clear: Yes to a two-state solution. But Israel's government responded with a step that, first and foremost, punishes Israel.

Haaretz Editorial | Dec.02, 2012 | 2:23 AM | 



The government decided this weekend to build another 3,000 housing units in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, and also to move ahead with planning and building procedures for the E1 area, located between Jerusalem and the West Bank settlement of Ma'aleh Adumim. That is how the government responded to the UN General Assembly's decision to recognize Palestine as a nonmember observer state; that is how the government decided to punish the Palestinians and the world.

The latter said its piece loud and clear: Yes to a two-state solution. But Israel's government responded with a step that, first and foremost, punishes Israel. The only positive aspect of this decision is the fact that Israel has recognized that the settlements are indeed a punishment.

This is a particularly grave and dangerous decision. Instead of internalizing the fact that a sweeping majority of nations are sick of the Israeli occupation and want a Palestinian state, Israel is entrenching itself even further in its own rejectionism, and deepening its isolation and the disconnect between itself and the international reality. Instead of drawing the necessary conclusions from its resounding failure, the government is dragging Israel into additional diplomatic disasters. And instead of embarking on sincere, genuine negotiations with the new observer state, Israel is turning its back on it, and on the world.

The government's decision is the last nail in the coffin of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Bar-Ilan University speech in 2009. It is proof positive that this speech, in which he ostensibly accepted the principle of two states, was merely a deception. What is particularly astounding, however, is the violation of Israel's commitment to the United States not to build in E1, given that construction there would preclude the establishment of a contiguous Palestinian state in the West Bank. After America was left as virtually the last supporter of Israel's position at the United Nations, Israel is repaying it with a resounding slap in the face.

Israel's decision is also a slap in the face to another loyal friend, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who explained Germany's abstention in the vote as stemming from Israel's refusal to stop construction in the territories. So, even before the next election, in which the joint "Likud-Beiteinu" ticket is presenting an especially right-wing, extremist slate, Netanyahu has already signaled where he is heading: toward extremism, diplomatic isolation, denunciation and ostracism by the world.

The world - even including the United States this time - can't allow Israel's arrogant response to pass quietly. This very government decision might serve as a spur to those who want to transfer the settlements issue to the International Criminal Court in The Hague, as punishment for the "punishment" imposed by Israel. And the next time Israel needs the world's help, on the Iranian issue or on any other, the world will remember this decision.

Thursday, November 29, 2012

Danny Danon's state

Danny Danon's state

While the center-left is splintering and weakening and failing to present an alternative worthy of the name, the right-right is growing ever stronger.

By Ari Shavit | Nov.29, 2012 | 1:27 AM

This week's news is simple and clear: Ehud Barak is leaving and Danny Danon is rising; Dan Meridor disappeared and Zeev Elkin was promoted; Benny Begin was ousted and Yariv Levin got a boost. While Tzipi Livni is devouring Yair Lapid's party, which devoured Kadima, which devoured Labor, which devoured Meretz, the extreme right is consolidating its rule over the self-described "national camp." While the center-left is splintering and weakening and failing to present an alternative worthy of the name, the right-right is growing ever stronger.

Fascism? Not yet. But the new faces of the Lieberman-Netanyahu duo's renewed ruling party are problematic faces. They herald the erosion of the rule of law, the castration of liberal democracy and the loss of national responsibility. The dramatic news of the week is that the darkness that has taken over the rightist bloc in the last two years now threatens to take over the State of Israel.

Many people loathe Barak. But even those who loathe the defense minister most will soon long for his good judgment. Many people dismiss Meridor. But even those who scorn the legal-political intellectual will soon mourn the absence of the excellence he embodies. Some people see Begin as an extremist, delusional ideologue. But even the most bitter opponents of this prince of princes will soon grasp how much his sense of values will be missed.

The political system that this week replaced Barak-Meridor-Begin with Danon-Elkin-Levin is a political system that is going off the rails. It is rejecting the qualities and values of democratic Israel and adopting the qualities and values of a benighted, aggressive, nationalist Israel.

One's heart goes out to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: Why bother winning an election that will turn you into the left flank of the crazed government that will arise? Why bother putting together a government in which you will be the hostage of Avigdor Lieberman, Tzipi Hotovely and Naftali Bennett?

After all, it's already clear that the next "Likud-Beiteinu" government will bury every good and beautiful thing that Zionism has succeeded in producing. It's already clear that Netanyahu's third government will be that of an Israeli Tea Party and will end in disaster. Is this the legacy Netanyahu wants to leave behind? Does he really want to go down in history as the one who turned the Jewish and democratic state into a state that is neither Jewish nor democratic, neither enlightened nor worthy?
Yet one also can't help being furious at Netanyahu. He had an opportunity to move to the center. He had an opportunity to unite all the sane Zionist forces under a single political roof. He could have been the statesman who liberated the Israeli majority from the tyranny of the settlers and the ultra-Orthodox and the burden of the loss of hope.

But Netanyahu preferred the short-term comfort of Shas and the Yesha Council of settlements and the Likud Central Committee. Netanyahu preferred the company of the Katzes (Yisrael and Haim ) and Moshe Feiglin. He made himself dependent on the vote-contractors and those who fan the flames of fanaticism.

What will happen? It will be bad. Ever since the 1950s, the Herut movement, out of which Likud grew, has sought to moderate itself and prove that it is not just national, but also liberal. This week, the Herut movement returned to being the party of raw nationalism and crude aggression. From this perspective, the expulsion of Begin and Meridor from Likud party headquarters at Metzudat Ze'ev is far more than a symbol. There's no longer any room for the children of Menachem Begin and Eliyahu Meridor in the ruling party that is now emerging - one devoid of all restraints.

But Barak's departure from politics is also more than just a symbol. In the childish, virtual, splintered center-left of 2012, there is no longer any room for men of action and responsible adults. This summer brought an end to the old elite of norms and the old elite of service, which didn't succeed in renewing themselves and producing heirs. Therefore, at a time when the strengthening Israeli right is marching us all toward the abyss, there are no longer any real forces in the country that can stand in its path and bar the way.

A bird's-eye view of the West Bank


A bird's-eye view of the West Bank

The Israeli government is working hard to change the map on the ground, while telling the people and the world that we have no partner with whom to talk.

By Ephraim Sneh | Nov.29, 2012 | 9:40 AM
On a recent trip back to Israel from the east, my El Al jet flew over the hills of the West Bank before making its descent into Ben-Gurion International Airport. The view from the airplane's windows said more than a thousand words could have possibly said about the problems facing Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

Almost every Israeli settlement on the ground below sported new construction, in process or complete.
What I saw at a glance from the plane's window, Abbas' people see every day. The Israeli government is working hard to change the map on the ground, while telling the people and the world that we have no partner with whom to talk.

I visited Abbas in Ramallah not long ago, together with a group of top army officers serving in the reserves. The truth is the categorical opposite: The man is practically begging to negotiate; he repeats and reiterates his commitment not to fall into the ways of terrorism and violence.

Abbas' distress grew all the more extreme following the Muslim Brotherhood's triumph in the Egyptian elections. Not only did he lose what Egyptian backing he had; its backing passed to his bitter enemy.
In effect, the Gulf states have also removed their support from Abbas. Qatar generously supports Hamas, while the Al Jazeera news network owned by the Gulf rulers is a mouthpiece of the Hamas rejection and terrorism machine. The ruling party in Turkey, an important Muslim nation that once had pretensions of being a regional peacemaker, embraces Hamas as its little sister. For the Palestinian president, threatened at home and isolated above, with an Israeli government that wants him gone, what choices remain?

Aside from resorting to violence, turning to the UN is Abbas' very last option. It is the only body in the world that could give him support. Abbas explicitly says that he would enter negotiations without preconditions with any Israeli prime minister right after the UN vote.

UN recognition of Palestine as an observer nation wouldn't be bad for Israel. On the contrary: Such a move would have two positive ramifications, neither tangible but both very material.

A UN decision to recognize Palestine as a nation creates an obstacle, granted a constitutional one, before a single bi-national nation. The decision also rules, 65 years after the UN resolution on Israel, that the land shall be divided: The Jewish nation gets 78% and the Arab nation gets 22%, roughly half of what it received in 1947.

After six wars and two intifadas, that is an important victory for Zionism.

Recognizing Palestine as a nation-not-a-people does not contradict or contravene the Oslo agreements. Those accords make a simple statement: If the Palestinians fight terrorism, Israel will help them get a state. The Palestinian Authority has been efficiently fighting terrorism; Israeli army and intelligence officers confirm as much. Yet the Palestinian people did not get their promised land.

The punitive threats voiced by inflammatory ministers posturing ahead of the elections are without substance. They reflect belligerence and anxiety, but if the threats are realized, Israel won't be shooting itself in the foot. It will be shooting itself in the gut.

If the Palestinian Authority collapses, the Israeli army will have to run the West Bank at terrific financial and diplomatic cost. Dismantling the Palestinian security forces would require Israel to enormously beef up its own forces to levels last seen during the Palestinian Intifada.

With the Sinai and Syria's part of the Golan Heights controlled by extremists, just keeping the quiet will gobble up the army's resources and eat away at its abilities. We saw this happen before the Second Lebanon War.

Israel and its allies should place just one condition before the Palestinian Authority: that it vow not to exploit its new status for hostile, corrupt purposes such as suing Israel at the Hague, or promoting boycotts. If Abbas can undertake that, his request should be accepted and he should be spared hysterical, inflammatory attacks.

The author has served as a minister in different Israeli governments and is presently chairman of the S. Daniel Abraham Center for Strategic Dialogue at the Netanya Academic College.

Recognizing a Diplomatic Horizon


Recognizing a Diplomatic Horizon

Recognition of a Palestinian state is not an obstacle to peace. Both Palestinians and Israelis deserve a real diplomatic horizon.

Haaretz Editorial | Nov.29, 2012 | 1:27 AM
The Palestinian Authority is due to request Thursday, November 29, that the UN General Assembly recognize Palestine as an observer nation. The symbolic timing - the same day as the 1947 UN vote on partitioning the land and creating the State of Israel - is likely to make this date an important part of the Palestinian heritage as well as the Israeli.

But there is more to the Palestinians' move than mere symbolism. A recognized Palestinian state will give Israel a responsible partner with international backing - one that will represent the entire Palestinian people and be able to make decisions in its name.

There is no basis for Israel's fear of international recognition of Palestine. The international treaties that will bind Palestine and its possible membership in the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court will not lift the occupation. At most, they will put appropriate restrictions on Israel's freedom of action. It's doubtful whether Palestine's new status will let it curb the settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem or provide leverage for withdrawing the Israel Defense Forces and evacuating the settlements.

All the same, the fictitious "balance of terror" isn't the right measure for examining the Palestinian request. The Palestinian nation, which until four decades ago Israel did not consider a nation, is now recognized by most countries around the world, including friends of Israel, as a national unit entitled to recognized borders and the title of a state.

Israel, which acted vigorously and even threatened to bring down the PA if it dared implement its aspiration for recognition, has understood in recent days that its position was weak and even damaging. But the prime minister, instead of taking a generous position granting early recognition to a Palestinian state and declaring that he is willing to negotiate with its president, is trying to impede the international decision and impose restrictions on it.

Recognition of a Palestinian state is not an obstacle to peace. President Mahmoud Abbas has committed to renewing talks with Israel immediately after his country is recognized. If Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wants to convince Israelis of his desire for peace, he must drop his objection to recognizing Palestine, be the first to congratulate Abbas for the historic achievement and provide an early date for renewing talks. It isn't just the Palestinians who deserve a diplomatic horizon. The Israelis deserve one too.

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Negating the Diaspora at our peril


Negating the Diaspora at our peril

Reform leader Rabbi Rick Jacobs sees that the community in the United States is no longer giving blind and unquestioning support to Israel. Not only has Israel ceased to be a source of pride for them, in many cases it is causing discomfort.

By Gusti Yehoshua Braverman Nov.21, 2012 | 6:31 AM
Rabbi Rick Jacobs, head of the Reform Judaism movement in North America, recently called on Diaspora Jews to protest Israeli discrimination against women and the non-Orthodox. Speaking at the recent General Assembly of Jewish Federations of North America, Rabbi Jacobs also called on Diaspora Jewry to open the discussion of Israel to a wider range of opinions. Some people consider Jacobs' remarks to be courageous. Others see them as impertinent and arrogant - yet more "proof" of the Reform movement's indifference to Zionism, especially in the United States.

Only someone who has close contact with Diaspora Jewry in general, and with liberal Reform Jewry in particular, understands that Rabbi Jacobs is speaking out of concern and a sense of responsibility to ensure the connection between Israel and liberal Jewry of North America. Our lives are entwined with the lives of Diaspora Jews in the United States. We seek their support in times of crisis, as well as their lobbying of the American administration on our behalf. We benefit from their money, particularly in strengthening public services that the government is abandoning. Reform donors help medical, cultural and welfare institutions. In times of peace and war (such as the present time ) - they support every Israeli citizen, regardless of religious or political worldview.

Rabbi Jacobs' remarks express concern for the unraveling relationship between world Jewry (particularly American Jewry ) and the State of Israel - a matter that should be of concern to all of us. Rabbi Jacobs sees that the Reform community in the United States is no longer giving blind and unquestioning support to Israel. On the contrary, its questions are only growing in number. Not only has Israel ceased to be a source of pride for them, in many cases it is causing discomfort. When you are a Jew living in America and are exposed mainly to criticism of the State of Israel in matters of religion and state, the doubts gnaw away at you.

It is difficult for me, as an Israeli, to see the one-sidedness, the ignorance and the double standard in the media coverage of Israel and its actions. At the same time, these reactions do not change at all the reality in which we are living, and about which Rabbi Jacobs warns: Israel's domestic conduct and the destructive relationship it maintains between religion and state.
The discrimination among religious streams in the country (Orthodox, Conservative and Reform ) has no parallel anywhere in the world: the fact that I have no guarantee that my tax money which is distributed among clerics will be transferred, at least in part, to the Reform congregation to which I belong; the fact that the only rabbi who can preside as the rabbi of a locality - whose salary is paid from my tax money - is an Orthodox rabbi, who for the most part will want to keep me out of the public space; the fact that my children, when they marry, will not be able to have their nuptials performed by a Reform rabbi - male or female - and be recognized by the state as married. (Absurdly, the State of Israel prefers to recognize the signature of a Christian municipal official on a marriage certificate than that of a Reform rabbi. ) These are but a few examples.

At the same General Assembly in Baltimore where Rabbi Jacobs spoke, journalism and political science Prof. Peter Beinart argued that since liberal Jewry in North America supports human rights, this public will not support Israel as long as Israel is perceived as being a human rights violator.
The State of Israel cannot close its ears to what Rabbi Jacobs and Peter Beinart are saying. On the eve of the Knesset election in Israel, the time has come for us to use the vote we are given to express our position on the issues that will determine our fate and our relations with Diaspora Jewry. This is a necessary stage in the realization of the very core of the Zionist vision, as we believe in it and as we find it expressed in the words of our national anthem: "Our hope is not yet lost - To be a free nation in our land."
The author is co-chair of the Department of Diaspora Activities in the World Zionist Organization, and former associate director of the Reform movement in Israel.

Monday, November 19, 2012

A Prayer for our brothers and sisters in Israel


A Prayer for our brothers and sisters in Israel

Holy One of blessing,
We pray for the people of Israel 
Who long to live under your canopy of peace. 
Keep them safe. When they are threatened, 
protect them from harm.
When they are wounded and bereaved,
Grant them healing and comfort. 
May they find strength and courage in the days ahead.

May our voices carry prayers of hope
That the people of Israel know that they are not alone.

God of mercy and compassion, remember Your covenant with Abraham Your friend 
And Your promise to the children of Ishmael, son of Hagar and Abraham.
May You help us to bring peace between the children of Isaac and Ishmael, 
And may Israel enjoy the fruits of a lasting peace
Dear God,
Give us strength
And know that there is nothing more sacred than peace.
Grant us dear God,
Faith. Courage. Wisdom.
The Temple will be sending money to B’Kavod the social justice arm of the reform movement in Israel, to help people who are suffering from the conflict

Thursday, November 15, 2012

American Jews are Giving Up on Israel


The most worrying news that came out of the U.S. presidential elections was that American Jews seem to have lost interest in Israel.

By Akiva Eldar | Nov.12, 2012

The most worrying news that came out of the U.S. presidential elections was that American Jews seem to have lost interest in Israel. Just 10 percent of American-Jewish voters said Israel was their highest priority when they went to the polls, according to a recent exit poll conducted by the pro-peace Israel lobby J Street. Nine out of 10 said domestic issues like job rates and health care were their top concerns. This is despite the fact that the Republicans and Jewish activists, many of whom are supporters of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, told countless horror stories about what they described as Barack Obama's plot to throw Israel to the Iranian wolves.
These statistics support the analysis of political commentator Peter Beinart, an associate professor at the City University of New York's Graduate School of Journalism, who argues that the ongoing occupation and the revelations of Israeli racism have distanced American Jews from Israel and from the Zionist idea.
J Street leaders are encouraged by the finding that 73 percent of U.S. Jewish voters approve of Obama's conduct regarding the Israeli-Arab conflict and note that 81 percent want active U.S. involvement in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Big deal. If that's the case, why is the Obama administration continuing to fearfully dance attendance on Netanyahu?
What is prompting the administration to order the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, to secure European support to block the Palestinians from upgrading their UN status, thus risking Mahmoud Abbas' standing as Palestinian Authority president? And who is preventing Obama from giving Netanyahu a similar choice to the one that George H.W. Bush gave Yitzhak Shamir during Israel's 1992 election season, in which Bush said Israel could choose deadlocked negotiations and settlement expansion or an American "political umbrella" and financial aid? Netanyahu intervened in the U.S. elections so coarsely; why would Obama hesitate to get involved in the Israeli one?
The answers to these questions can be found in a new study of Israeli Jewish views by the Walter Lebach Institute for Jewish-Arab Coexistence through Education, at Tel Aviv University, which - especially when examined alongside other polls of Israeli attitudes toward the U.S. election - demonstrates the marked differences between Jewish Israeli voters and Jewish American ones.
Half the respondents said a majority of Jewish MKs should have to approve the evacuation of settlements, and 20 percent or less are concerned by the prospect of losing a Jewish majority in the country. About a third of secular respondents said the settlements are a legitimate aspect of Zionist history, and 80 percent of Israeli Jews said they don't think Israel and the Palestinians are likely to reach an agreement - a stark counterpoint to the roughly equal proportion of U.S. Jews who support American involvement in resolving the conflict.
And while nearly three-quarters of the U.S. Jews polled by J Street said they approved of the way Obama has been dealing with the conflict, Israeli polls have shown that most Israelis preferred Mitt Romney to Obama and did not want Obama to intervene in Israeli-Palestinian affairs.
I received an email over the weekend from someone who described himself as a longtime reader and a Meretz voter that shows why cautious Americans would be keeping their distance from Israel: "I realize that the arguments of the left are more complicated to explain than the fear and hatred propagated by the right," he wrote. "But you and your colleagues, the journalists of the left, have the obligation to analyze and explain, first of all, what has happened so far. What are the Palestinians seeking or suggesting, how has Israel violated the Oslo Accords? Why did the Camp David talks fail and why did the second intifada break out, why is Gaza still our responsibility and why are they firing on us from there?"
Let's say Haaretz commentators manage to convince every last reader that the injustice of the occupation and the settlements are the primary reason the Oslo Accords fell through; how many seats would this gain the Zionist left in the Knesset? (The Zionist left basically means Meretz, since we must respect Labor leader Shelly Yacimovich's request to stop labeling the Labor Party as left-wing. ) After all, a single edition of casino mogul Sheldon Adelson's right-wing free newspaper Israel Hayom reaches more readers, and potential voters, than do dozens of columns in Haaretz.
J Street leaders may be feeling a bit of schadenfreude now that it has become clear that Adelson, who invested heavily in Romney's campaign in an effort to advance his right-wing worldview, put his money on the wrong candidate. But Adelson isn't giving up. He is putting his money - and his newspaper, whose name means "Israel Today" - on the wrong candidate here too, to perpetuate the Israel of today: an occupying, belligerent and racist country. It's too bad that the American Jews who had hoped for an Israel of tomorrow - a democratic, upright and secure country - are giving up on us.